|
Home > God
> God does not exist > secular
humanism > our purpose
> email
This is my reply to Dr. R:
Hello Dr. R******, thank you for your comments concerning
the definition of the word "evolution".
You are right to question the usage of the word
"evolution". This word is commonly misused and misunderstood.
On the http://www.missiontoamerica.org/secular_humanism/our-purpose.html
page I was using the word "evolution" as it is commonly
used - to mean life arising from non-life and slowly changing, to
become more complex over a long period of time, with the end result
being us. The dictionary definition is more general, but it encompasses
this definition.
You rightly point out that success, or survival,
is defined as reproductive success. For example, rabbits do not
have great physical strength, but they are highly "successful"
because they reproduce prolifically.
However, the point of the web page was not to discuss
the mechanism for evolutionary success. The purpose is to show that
life based on evolution -- reproductive success -- is meaningless.
Whether or not the sun expands to swallow the earth
is a meaningless statement, as the predicted time frame is very
far in the future. Anyone reading this will be long dead, and thus
it does not influence people's decisions about how they live their
lives today.
My question to you is: if life (and thus
us) was created by the random interaction of non-living chemicals,
and when we die we return to being random non-living chemicals,
what's the point? We were created in a random process and we return
to randomness. In the period between those two random conditions,
why should I not do whatever I want to do?
For example, why should I not try to impregnate
as many women as possible? That would improve my reproductive success.
Why should I care how it affects anyone else?
The Bible tells us that we were created in the image of God. We
are not here as a result of purposeless random processes.
|