Millions of Years?
The Bible says the world is about six thousand
years old. But it seems like everything we learn from science tells
us the world is billions of years old and the dinosaurs lived hundreds
of millions of years ago.
Who is telling the truth? God or scientists?
What are the facts? Is a 6,000 year age for
the earth based on different facts than a billion year age for the
earth?
No,
everyone is looking at the same facts. We are looking at the same
fossils. We are looking at the same layers of sediment? We are looking
at the same radiographic dating of rocks. No one disputes the facts.
The difference comes from how those facts are interpreted.
Why must the facts be interpreted?
Because no one was there to see what happened.
We can not directly observe and measure history. We must look at
what we have in the present, and follow that evidence to wherever
it leads us.
What is some of the evidence?
#1- Fossils take millions of years
to form.
There's a problem with that statement. It's
not true.
Museums
have fossils that are only a few decades old. For example, there
is a museum that has a fossilized cowboy boot and a fossilized pickle
from the 1950's. It does not take very long for something to become
fossilized.
Didn't it take millions and millions of years
for dinosaurs to turn into oil? No. There is a refinery
in Texas that takes in turkey carcasses and turns them into
oil in three hours. It doesn't take millions of years to make oil.
Given the right conditions of temperature, pressure, etc., it only
takes a few hours.
#2 - It took millions of years to
build up all those rock layers the fossils are buried in.
There's a problem with that statement. It's
not true.
When Mount St. Helens erupted scientists observed
thousands of layers of sediment, 30 feet thick, laid down in three
hours. A lot of water (say from Noah's global flood), over a short
time can easily create millions of rock layers. And what would we
find in those rock layers? Lots of dead things killed by Noah's
flood--which is exactly what we see.
#3 - There are scientific methods
used to date rocks that tell us they are millions of years old.
There's a problem with that statement. It's
not true.
There are about 100 methods of dating rocks
based on measuring radioactive decay. The problem is that using
these methods you'll probably get 100 different ages for the rock.
One of the problems scientists face is picking the dating method
that gives an age for the rock that is the age they want it to have.
They'll test a rock, and if the test does not give the age they
want, they try another test.
It's interesting that these same tests, when
used on new rocks (from volcanos such as Mt. St. Helens) give ages
for these new rocks that say they are millions of years old. That
doesn't add up.
FREE MP3 Creation Podcast
Scientists
and Their Beliefs - by Dr. Donald Chittick. Learn
the answers to these questions: What are the belief options
for origins? Why is there so much disagreement? Which side,
creationism or evolutionism, has more evidence? Is the idea
of creation against science?
|
Learn more about radiographic
dating in this paper written by a college student. (Learn more
about Student Papers).
The Bible
| The Science | Email
|